Here's a quote I took from the PETA website:
"Contrary to myth, PETA does not want to confiscate animals who are well cared for and "set them free." What we want is for the population of dogs and cats to be reduced through spaying and neutering and for people to adopt animals (preferably two so that they can keep each other company when their human companions aren't home) from pounds or sheltersânever from pet shops or breedersâthereby reducing suffering in the world."
I found it in the faq section. Of course, it does have some moreat the top where it says they feel animals should never have been domesticated in the first place. I think there are some people who are affiliated with PETA that go to extreme tactics, such as confiscating and"releasing" pets. But, as with any group of people, Idon't think they represent the majority.They certainlydo get headlines, though, so they are more prominent than the people who quietly advocate for animal rights. I think it is likely that in some places these people find each other and form groups that go to extremes.
I don't belong to PETA, because I do disagree with some of the more extreme tactics, but I do support the overall idea of reducing animal suffering. I do know a couple people involved with PETA, but the most extreme thing they do in their lives is try not to buy products that are (unnecessarily) tested on animals, they don't eat meat, and don't wear leather of fur.
I am not trying to advocate *for* PETA here, I've already stated I'm not a member. But I don't think they'll automatically come into someone's home and take their pets.
I'm not really trying to start a discussion of pro vs. con PETA. Just my 2cents.