Please Sign if you support responsable small breeders!

Advertise with us
Love your rabbit
shop deals on amazon
Shop deals on ebay
Rabbits Online Forum

Help Support Rabbits Online Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I cant adopt from a rescue because I have young kids...Ill support breeders who breed with good intent and responsibly always. and f i get another dog, ill be going to a good breeder with healthy lines bc i cant deal with issues again like i have in the past
 
I signed!
I'm all for supporting local and small breeders who are responsible enough to breed their rabbits true/as close to the ARBA Standard of Perfection as they possibly can!

I'm 13, and I would like to become one of these responsible small breeders in a few years.
 
my aunt sent this to me- she has shelties from other smaller breeders but for her they are pets- she signed, then I got it onto Facebook and spread it that way as well!
 
I did sign. I have mixed feelings on breeders to be honest (I'd rather rescue). I often don't like how they view their animals. But there are good breeders out there that love their animals and those shouldn't pay just because there a lot of bad breeders. There should be something done with these bad breeders that doesn't punish the good ones out there.
 
I signed, but I want to do more research on it. I am ALL for the selling of live animals in pet stores to be abolished (even though it never really will be).

For instance, what is a "breeding female"? Does that just mean intact or does that mean of breeding age? I think that it would be much more productive to limit the amount of litters that someone can have per year rather than number of females since most responsible breeders will not breed all of their females in a given situation.

And I also do not agree with buying sight unseen with the exception of some situations. While it can go successfully, I just don't see the point since most of the time it involves shipping the animal as cargo on a flight, where a puppy or kitten can ride under the seat along with a passenger for maybe a $100 dollar difference? It would be SO much less stressful on the animals that way.

I'm glad congress is working towards this goal, but this doesn't seem like the most practical way to be doing it, since it is getting such a negative response.
 
breeding female : Females that are of breeding age and are being used or can be used in a breeding program. That's how I would define it.
 
For a lot of breeds (especially the rare ones) are hard to find locally. There are many times that breeders will purchase a rabbit from far away and it'll get transported by someone else that's heading to a show/event/Convention to be picked up by the new owner. Hardly anyone will ship a rabbit via airplane, because it's so hard on them. But sometimes having one transported by someone coming your way is the only way to get some of the breeds out there...or to even improve your own stock with some outside blood.

Breeding female is ANY intact female. Unless they're all spayed, anyone with the X amount of breeding animals will need a license.

And if this bill were to pass, then next it'll start targeting pet owners. This was probably backed by ARA types, whose ultimate goal is to see NO animals as pets. It's a slippery slope, and not one I'm comfortable with.
 
wendymac wrote:
For a lot of breeds (especially the rare ones) are hard to find locally. There are many times that breeders will purchase a rabbit from far away and it'll get transported by someone else that's heading to a show/event/Convention to be picked up by the new owner. Hardly anyone will ship a rabbit via airplane, because it's so hard on them. But sometimes having one transported by someone coming your way is the only way to get some of the breeds out there...or to even improve your own stock with some outside blood.
Click to expand...
This really worries me. I am starting a second breed and am planning on picking them up at Convention. They're a very rare breed and there are NO breeders in my state, and very very few even in the surrounding states. I'm picking them up at Convention, but they're coming from Washington. How are people going to be able to promote and encourage people to try the rarer breeds when they can't actually get or see them?

Also, I picked up a few rabbits at this past Nationals and there would have been absolutely no way I could have driven to each state to pick up one rabbit. It was so convenient to just be able to pick them all up at one location.
 
DharmaBuns wrote:
wendymac wrote:
For a lot of breeds (especially the rare ones) are hard to find locally. There are many times that breeders will purchase a rabbit from far away and it'll get transported by someone else that's heading to a show/event/Convention to be picked up by the new owner. Hardly anyone will ship a rabbit via airplane, because it's so hard on them. But sometimes having one transported by someone coming your way is the only way to get some of the breeds out there...or to even improve your own stock with some outside blood.
Click to expand...
This really worries me. I am starting a second breed and am planning on picking them up at Convention. They're a very rare breed and there are NO breeders in my state, and very very few even in the surrounding states. I'm picking them up at Convention, but they're coming from Washington. How are people going to be able to promote and encourage people to try the rarer breeds when they can't actually get or see them?

Also, I picked up a few rabbits at this past Nationals and there would have been absolutely no way I could have driven to each state to pick up one rabbit. It was so convenient to just be able to pick them all up at one location.
Click to expand...

I guess I could understand that, and I would consider that an exceptional circumstance.

And it would be hard by restricting number of females rather than litters by that definition. Like in terms of dogs, a female goes through their first heat cycle at two but they cant even get their hips done til their a year to be tested again at two years before being bred for the first time, and breeders who choose not to spay a 6 yr old dog because of the increased risk when they're out of their prime years.

I'm glad I signed then, especially when rescues being affected was brought up.
 
Yes, it includes rescues, too. The "adoption" fees that are charged would go to the $500/year total. And they do NOT consider any expenses, just the flat $500/year on sales.

And this part is another thing that blows my mind: Pet stores, even if they sell over the internet, still won't need a license. Something about it being too complicated to figure out sales in person and those via other means.

Really? How is that any more complicated than the breeder? I think it's just a way for the USDA to get more money coming in.
 
wendymac wrote:
Yes, it includes rescues, too. The "adoption" fees that are charged would go to the $500/year total. And they do NOT consider any expenses, just the flat $500/year on sales.

And this part is another thing that blows my mind: Pet stores, even if they sell over the internet, still won't need a license. Something about it being too complicated to figure out sales in person and those via other means.

Really? How is that any more complicated than the breeder? I think it's just a way for the USDA to get more money coming in.
Click to expand...

Have you seen the conditions for animals at some of these pet stores? THEY are the ones that are usually rabbit breeding factories...they need to make a profit! Often times they have incredibly cramped and filthy conditions and high "losses" of animals. Of course, this isn't all pet stores but it seems to be the case all too often.

As a dedicated breeder I'm in it for the breed. I never got into this hobby expecting to make money and my husband and I quickly realized that this was an EXPENSIVE hobby.

I hope that no one takes offense to this but I think that part of the problem comes from the "lop" breeders, lionhead breeders and mini rex breeders. I can't tell you how many times I've heard people say that they breed a lot so that they can sell a lot and make money. These are the small "cute" breeds that everyone wants as pets and they just seem to be absolutely FLOODING the pet market.
 
Wait, so if it doesn't count against pet stores, what is it for?! As far as I am concerned, the world would not be missing out if all those selling live animals were to shut down.

And I don't think It's lop and lionhead breeders are the problem in specific, it is the people who FANCY themselves breeders who are the problem. "Oh I got this rabbit from a pet store and this one from cl, and they're cute, so I'm gonna breed them!" And then I just turn into a giant rage monster. Because they of course sell them for 5 dollars do ignorant owners are more likely to buy them over the more expensive line whos health has been tracked through multiple generations and was bred as a result of deep thought and research.

You see the same things in dogs. The market is flooded with labs and goldens because of their popularity, but people dont know what they're doing and end up passing on undesireable health and behavioral traits.
 
Nelsons_Mom wrote:
Wait, so if it doesn't count against pet stores, what is it for?! As far as I am concerned, the world would not be missing out if all those selling live animals were to shut down.

And I don't think It's lop and lionhead breeders are the problem in specific, it is the people who FANCY themselves breeders who are the problem. "Oh I got this rabbit from a pet store and this one from cl, and they're cute, so I'm gonna breed them!" And then I just turn into a giant rage monster. Because they of course sell them for 5 dollars do ignorant owners are more likely to buy them over the more expensive line whos health has been tracked through multiple generations and was bred as a result of deep thought and research.

You see the same things in dogs. The market is flooded with labs and goldens because of their popularity, but people dont know what they're doing and end up passing on undesireable health and behavioral traits.
Click to expand...

Dont even get me started with the Bully Breeds.. If you look on CL that's all you see. I had the product of a English Bull Terrier from a byb, needless to say I had to rehome because of temperment issues! Bad breeding!!! :(

Sorry I got off topic... i feel very passionate about this.
 
I wanted to post this link I saw it other day when I was researching before signing the petition and was just able to find it again. I also read somewhere but can't find it of course that its' not limited to a 4 females in one species so what if you have a couple bunnies along with a dog and a cat. It's a very slippery slope.

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/animal_welfare/2012/retail_pets_faq.pdf
 
What about Youth breeders? Wouldn't it be quite dangerous if it were required for Youth to have people come to their homes to look at rabbits?
 
eclairemom said:
I wanted to post this link I saw it other day when I was researching before signing the petition and was just able to find it again. I also read somewhere but can't find it of course that its' not limited to a 4 females in one species so what if you have a couple bunnies along with a dog and a cat. It's a very slippery slope.

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/animal_welfare/2012/retail_pets_faq.pdf
Click to expand...

having read that, I'm honestly not seeing what the big deal is. a USDA license is not difficult to obtain. the new rule wouldn't be any more strict than the old one, it would just close a loophole. if you're not selling animals "sight unseen", you'd still be exempt from needing a license... and if you've got five or more intact females, you've probably got a fairly large breeding program that, in my opinion, could stand a little oversight if your customers don't see your facilities and/or see the animal(s) they're purchasing in-person before buying them. it shouldn't really effect pets much, as pets generally are (or at least should be) spayed for health reasons. the majority of pets that can't be spayed (hamsters and other rodents, for example) don't count towards your total of "intact females" (for example, until I got rid of some of Misty's babies, I had multiple intact female hamsters and two intact female sugar gliders and was still exempt from needing a license despite having more than three total intact females).

the proposed changes would actually *benefit* sugar glider breeders - I have one breeding pair + one "pet only" female... if I ended up with four adult females due to not getting a pair of female joeys sold before they reached breeding age, I would need a license under the current laws - with the changes, there would be a little more wiggle room.
 
DharmaBuns said:
wendymac wrote:

Have you seen the conditions for animals at some of these pet stores? THEY are the ones that are usually rabbit breeding factories...they need to make a profit! Often times they have incredibly cramped and filthy conditions and high "losses" of animals. Of course, this isn't all pet stores but it seems to be the case all too often.

As a dedicated breeder I'm in it for the breed. I never got into this hobby expecting to make money and my husband and I quickly realized that this was an EXPENSIVE hobby.

I hope that no one takes offense to this but I think that part of the problem comes from the "lop" breeders, lionhead breeders and mini rex breeders. I can't tell you how many times I've heard people say that they breed a lot so that they can sell a lot and make money. These are the small "cute" breeds that everyone wants as pets and they just seem to be absolutely FLOODING the pet market.
Click to expand...

That's the biggest problem we have in KY, our market is flooded with Lion Heads and Holland/Mini lops and also the new Zealand crosses we have very few purebred breeders in KY. Down here, if it's got a uterus it can make us money is the mentality. Yes I do sometimes breed my dutch a little heavy(more than 10 babies on the ground for me is a LOT), but I'll cull babies out at 4-6 weeks old to folks that use them as feeders and I'll keep some myself for 'other' purposes outside of my well marked ones that I keep for show- for which I am horribly selective- only the cream of the crop sticks around.
I just signed it again! LOL.
 
I support responsible, registered breeders because they are experienced and as well as doing it for personal reasons (because they enjoy rabbits and the hobby of keeping and breeding them), they have the rabbits best interest in mind. I know breeders who only sell to other registered breeders and people they know. Most of the breeders I've met never sell rabbits to the public during the easter period, which is when most rabbits end up in rescues. And they are always willing to be contacted should you need help of any kind. Not all breeders are irresponsible. Responsible breeders are just as concerned about irresponsible owners and abandoned rabbits just like the rest of us, but they can only do so much. It's the owners responsibility to do the research and look after the rabbit. Too much blame is being put on the breeders and not enough on the irresponsible owners. The ones that are in it for a quick buck are the main cause of all the rescue rabbits imo. I agree that education is the problem because so many people buy a pet rabbit not knowing anything about them or what to expect. I did months worth of research before i finally decided i wanted a bunny and it was the best decision ive ever made! And if there weren't breeders in Australia then i wouldn't have any bunnies, and i just can't see myself without them in my life!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top