Yeah, as a journalist, based solely on the first post, I have to say without the facts and witnesses presented,it would have been a non-story. It would have been written off asemotional (if notfanatical) and not pursued. Although of course I personally understand the emotion,the apparent speculation and the references to the 'prison' were the main problems.
Accidents happen, euthanasiais the right of the owner, but it has to be humane. Unless more info reveals the injury wasn't accidental, the only point that can be pursued is the latter, and only if witnesses state it wasn't in fact humane, or the methoddoesn't fit whatever laws are in place in that area.
I'm sure withthe heat of the moment subsiding, Randyknows enough to do the researchand present facts that WILL peg this breeder (he obviouslyknows the guy's history) as a bad egg, but this incident, as presented, can't really stand on it's own.
Any rescuer entering an agricultural arena will always be treated with apprehension, thanks to their more fanatical brethren. But at least their presence will keep the organizers and participants on their toes and ensure better care for their livestock, in this case especially the rabbits, traditionally rural underdogs -- right down there with chickens.
Thanks to Randy for helping and caring, and thanks to Pam for tempering it withreality.
sas