piperknitsRN
Well-Known Member
According to Ken Rockwell's online review of the D3100:
"A firmware defect causes the Auto ISO to rise to the same high ISO it would pick without flash. In other words, with Auto ISO and flash, you'll usually be shooting at ISO 3,200, or whatever you've set for the maximum Auto ISO ISO!"
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3100.htm
While I can see a few "work arounds" to this issue (setting default max ISO to 1600, say) it still baffles me as to why Nikon would program their firmware in such a way. I mean, wouldn't an ISO of 3200 + flash usually wash out pictures? (I realize there are other variables at play, but 3200 + flash just seems like overkill in most situations).
That said, I've used auto focus and flash for a number of indoor shots (especially a few where I've handed off my camera to someone else to take the picture) and not noticed this to be a "problem" given my general-all-around-purposes picture taking needs at the time (like, a quick portrait of my classmates). Perhaps I'd notice the "problem" if I were looking at a printed copy of my picture, but I'd really need comparisons to see the difference online--as the photograph looks just fine to me (and I suppose that's what ultimately matters).
Any way, curious, I checked the EXIF data on those particular pictures, and sure enough, the ISO was auto-set at 3200... which just seems excessive even for indoor shots under moderate lighting conditions.
Of course, I don't know enough to really be talking about this issue intelligently--I just think it puts a wrench in using auto mode (I've been using other semi-manual modes like A and S lately, but this is mostly when I've been photographing the bunnies and have the time to spare, not when I'm out with a group of people and we're taking snapshots on the fly, for instance--then I usually rely on my old crutch, "auto").
I feel a bit goofy complaining about it, even, since I know so little about photography, but was wondering if any one else had ever gotten a washed-out looking photo from using auto mode because of this issue.
"A firmware defect causes the Auto ISO to rise to the same high ISO it would pick without flash. In other words, with Auto ISO and flash, you'll usually be shooting at ISO 3,200, or whatever you've set for the maximum Auto ISO ISO!"
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/d3100.htm
While I can see a few "work arounds" to this issue (setting default max ISO to 1600, say) it still baffles me as to why Nikon would program their firmware in such a way. I mean, wouldn't an ISO of 3200 + flash usually wash out pictures? (I realize there are other variables at play, but 3200 + flash just seems like overkill in most situations).
That said, I've used auto focus and flash for a number of indoor shots (especially a few where I've handed off my camera to someone else to take the picture) and not noticed this to be a "problem" given my general-all-around-purposes picture taking needs at the time (like, a quick portrait of my classmates). Perhaps I'd notice the "problem" if I were looking at a printed copy of my picture, but I'd really need comparisons to see the difference online--as the photograph looks just fine to me (and I suppose that's what ultimately matters).
Any way, curious, I checked the EXIF data on those particular pictures, and sure enough, the ISO was auto-set at 3200... which just seems excessive even for indoor shots under moderate lighting conditions.
Of course, I don't know enough to really be talking about this issue intelligently--I just think it puts a wrench in using auto mode (I've been using other semi-manual modes like A and S lately, but this is mostly when I've been photographing the bunnies and have the time to spare, not when I'm out with a group of people and we're taking snapshots on the fly, for instance--then I usually rely on my old crutch, "auto").
I feel a bit goofy complaining about it, even, since I know so little about photography, but was wondering if any one else had ever gotten a washed-out looking photo from using auto mode because of this issue.