Leaf
Well-Known Member
I dont know what all to say, really.
Their legs were much worse than I could have anticipated and I had tried to prepare myself for the worst.
Everything is a little confusing - if the rescue estimated them at 12 weeks when they were taken in - they are a LARGE breed.
If they're New Zealands as my vet believes, they were probably a lot younger than the rescue thought when taken in.
The rescue listed them as Jersey Wooly mixes - a smaller breed? Their vetting consisted of health certificates that noted a slight splay of the legs...
Dr Frick knows Dr Harvey - she's actually been HRS certified through the CA vet and has attended many of her 15 hour seminars. I dunno, but Dr Frick says she is glad they are at leastwith a person willing to work with them and who understands what their care entails.
Compassion and sadness definantly shined through on her part today.
My vet is shocked that they passed a health exam to be able to fly. Perhaps a paperwork error, or fudge?
I dont want to be overly positive in the public posts I make about them - but at the same time I dont want to be negative either since they came through a "well known" rescue.
That said, once examined our discussion turned to quality of life and how long they possibly "have".
I don't regret adopting them and WOULD do it again, but I really wish I had been more prepared for how bad they actually are.
Nothing I learned today has really suprised me as far as their condition goes, so I'm not overly disappointed. They're still DOLLS!
People have been asking for me to post videos of them. I'm still uneasy about that right now - it's easier to see them in person, know their condition and see how HAPPY they are right now - than to be shocked into seeing their mobility issues and drawing conclusions from that.
To be honest if I had seen a video of them in motion I would have hesitated to take them in, but knowing them in person I dont think the adoption was a mistake.
Doe that make sense?
Their legs were much worse than I could have anticipated and I had tried to prepare myself for the worst.
Everything is a little confusing - if the rescue estimated them at 12 weeks when they were taken in - they are a LARGE breed.
If they're New Zealands as my vet believes, they were probably a lot younger than the rescue thought when taken in.
The rescue listed them as Jersey Wooly mixes - a smaller breed? Their vetting consisted of health certificates that noted a slight splay of the legs...
Dr Frick knows Dr Harvey - she's actually been HRS certified through the CA vet and has attended many of her 15 hour seminars. I dunno, but Dr Frick says she is glad they are at leastwith a person willing to work with them and who understands what their care entails.
Compassion and sadness definantly shined through on her part today.
My vet is shocked that they passed a health exam to be able to fly. Perhaps a paperwork error, or fudge?
I dont want to be overly positive in the public posts I make about them - but at the same time I dont want to be negative either since they came through a "well known" rescue.
That said, once examined our discussion turned to quality of life and how long they possibly "have".
I don't regret adopting them and WOULD do it again, but I really wish I had been more prepared for how bad they actually are.
Nothing I learned today has really suprised me as far as their condition goes, so I'm not overly disappointed. They're still DOLLS!
People have been asking for me to post videos of them. I'm still uneasy about that right now - it's easier to see them in person, know their condition and see how HAPPY they are right now - than to be shocked into seeing their mobility issues and drawing conclusions from that.
To be honest if I had seen a video of them in motion I would have hesitated to take them in, but knowing them in person I dont think the adoption was a mistake.
Doe that make sense?