Interesting...
I have mixed feelings about these registries.
Yes, they can help you be aware of people living in your area that maybe sexual offenders. But you should always assume that predatorsare around. The registered offenders are only theones that have been caught and convicted. There may just as well bethose around your home that haven't yet been charged for their crimes.
But my main objection to the registries is two-fold. First, they don'tsay when the sexual offense was committed. These convictions could beupwards of 30 years old and you're looking at someone who hasn'tre-offended in that entire time.
Second, the names of the convictions are sometimes misleading. Not toput too fine a point on it, but a 19-year old having sex with his16-year old girlfriend would be considered sexual assualt of a minor.
Just recently here in Maine, a man from Nova Scotia came down andvisited the homes of six men on our state's sex offender registry,thanks to their home addresses being listed. He killed two of them. Oneof the men was relatively young, and had been convicted as a sexualoffender because of a situation very similar to the one I mentionedabove: he had an underage girlfriend. He didn't have money for alawyer, or bail, but he was allowed to walk if he agreed to havehis name on the registry. Did he deserve to be listed? Maybe.
But that information led to his murder, because someone thought theywere ridding the world of a child molester. That, in my mind, isunacceptable.
I don't think these criminals should be sheltered in the least. Sexualcrimes are reprehensible. But do we need to know where they live? Andwork?
I don't know.