Judging from the pictures, she is definitely a tort. In tort, you can have black, blue, chocolate and lilac. She is much to light for a black, or chocolate. That leaves only blue and lilac. You are right, they look very similar since they are both dilute, but blues usually have much more blue coloring on their points. This doe is lighter and to me she just looks more like a lilac.
Emily
Silver Star Rabbitry
Raising and Showing Quality Silver Marten Rabbits in North Louisiana.
Ok I say lilac tort. Look at a lilac and look at a blue. you can tell the dif. I have blue babies so I can tell the dif easily. lilac is lighter and if you look at the pics of a solid blue and a solid lilac you can def. tell that this kit is a lilac tort. Idk maybe its just me
Lol that one's a buck, not a doe guys. =P Ya, I knew it wasn't a chocolate tort. or black tort. cause I own a couple black torts. No chocolate-based parents. There's all BEWs in the generation except for the dad is a lynx vc, his generation has some broken blacks, and the mother's grandmother was a smoke pearl.
Oh ho ho . how Holland lop genetics work, not as easy as Dutch. FrostyXFrosty and I get a smoke pearl and a sable point. It actually makes sense when you do a punnett square
Your baby is gorgeous though
Here's the thing I have noticed about Hollands. You have to wait a while longer to see how they develop .Most of the breedes I know wait 12-16 weeks and pick the ones they want to keep for their herd. With dutch you know right off the bat if they have the correct markings are any dq's then at 8 weeks you pretty much know their type
This is why I am booting the Blue and Lilac Harlequins from my program. I personally can not see the difference. I think part of it is my eyesite... too much confusion.
Yes, VM rabbits are unshowable, but if they're only carriers with no physical attributes revealing the Vienna gene, then he could be showable. I'm selling him as a pet anyways. =)